Re:We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
by nwh on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @08:41AM
(#7704049)
Any run of three characters in sequence, forward or reverse, is marked as invalid. 123 876 432 would all mark the whole password as invalid, even if they only take up half the string. Yours would pass though, yes.
Re:We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
by fluidcruft on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @10:32AM
(#7704673)
His is two vertical runs along the keypad. The forbidden ones are horizontal runs. That's why it's stupid. Any modeling of passwords humans would generate for use on a keypad should forbid 741 by the same logic that forbids 123.
Re:We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
by cail on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @09:18AM
(#7704218)
My guess (with nothing to back it up) is people will start moving into paterns of 963 852 741 or the reverse since they're easy to type on the numpad without really remembering the values.
edit: On second look, that's exactly what you did in your example.
Re:We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
by ajuc on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @09:12AM
(#7704189)
Date of birth probably. Now half of their passwords has 19xx in the same position.
I'm of the opinion that everybody should be given public and private key at birth.
Re:We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
by freehunter on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @10:13AM
(#7704531)
It's called name and social security number :)
I am curious what simple pattern people will adapt to once you eliminate simple sequences. It has got to be predictable, as in someone could put math behind it.