News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by hueving on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @06:56AM (#7703674)
>it conveys a modern design.

That's a terrible reason to pick a design. If you have no justification for a design other than 'lots of other new websites do this', then you have no justification at all... unless your purpose is to blend in and be forgotten.

Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by teaneedz on Wednesday May 07, 2014 @08:59PM (#7713446)
Actually, my justification was that everything just gets out of your way.

Personally, I find the new design conveys a more relaxing experience although I'd like to see some of the fonts grow a bit. By modern, I refer to a different online world than #000 against #FFF and skeuo approaches. I'm not saying, those days are over completely, but fresher approaches are nice too.

Let's face it - design will continue to morph based upon different philosophies and whims, just as fashion does. Some visions are worse than others but some are implemented in pretty clever ways. I like the way DDG went with theirs.

For a modern web property or search engine competing against the likes of Google, what timdiggerm mentioned in a reply nails it. Sticking with an older design philosophy conveys a negative image for many users.

However, other properties going flat and subdued do not necessarily get my attention just because everyone else is doing it. This one does though because they did a lot of things right. The more I use next.duckduckgo.com the more I appreciate the small details that were thought out.

Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by timdiggerm on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @10:26AM (#7704638)
Ah, but an old design conveys amateur quality, which does not compete well in people's minds with Google, etc.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by CWuestefeld on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @01:15PM (#7705778)
I don't think that Levi-Strauss is losing market share for not being trendy. A strong, working product trumps fashion, in my book.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by Angostura on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @02:12PM (#7706145)
Levi-Strauss uses a deliberately retro design language as a core part of its marketing. All those rivets and obvious stitches serve little purpose other than to project an faux-naive olde timey image. I can't see any reason for DDG to follow a similar design approach, unless they want to go for the Steampunk user base.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by ugexe on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @03:53PM (#7706708)
This is not true. If you are a desk jockey then maybe you don't need rivets, but they (along with all stitching besides the back pocket stitch design) certainly help keep your denim together if you are the least bit hard on them. Ripping off pocket corners or blowing out crotch stitching is something that happens. And I'm pretty sure Levi's also offers denim with non contrast stitching.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by timdiggerm on Wednesday May 07, 2014 @08:47AM (#7709809)
pants and search engines have pretty different customer expectations re: aesthetics