News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by bachmeier on Monday May 05, 2014 @08:39PM (#7702227)
I use DDG for most searches. The new site looks better but that's not helpful if I can't read it. I'm not 22 with good eyesight. At a minimum, there has to be a button available to fix the contrast issue.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by nine_k on Monday May 05, 2014 @11:56PM (#7702761)
...And the button there is. Did you find it? https://next.duckduckgo.com/settings
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by bachmeier on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @07:00AM (#7703687)
No. And I'm willing to bet that at least 99% of search engine users aren't going to look for an unlabeled settings button for a search engine. They'll just use something else.
Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by e12e on Wednesday May 07, 2014 @06:38AM (#7709461)
For something as utilitarian as a search engine, being usable by default, and cool after tweaking is probably better than the reverse. I question the logic of having such a setting at all -- it's not just a matter of preference, having the setting is basically admitting that the default design has a (serious) usability issue -- so logically it shouldn't be the default.

It's kind of funny that we went from black on grey (netscape), via black on white (ie4) to grey on white (by design/via css) -- rather than simply back to black on grey or grey on black ("console" colors) -- as there's been some studies indicating that darker background leads to less power usage -- which actually has a usability benefit in longer battery life -- all the while maintaining a lower contrast.

Re:The next version of DuckDuckGo by FoeNyx on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @01:38AM (#7702999)
ha right, I missed it at first because it doesn't work without enabling javascript ...