News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pairwise and Y Combinator: Do you have what it takes to b... by amichail on Friday March 30, 2007 @06:22PM (#7702)
Even if we take it as a given that a test like this can work well, I suspect that test takers will become more sophisticated at choosing images to get desired outcomes.

And so the test will need to get more sophisticated in turn by finding even more non-obvious yet discriminating pairs of images.

This is sort of like the constant battle between those creating spam filters and spammers.

Re:Pairwise and Y Combinator: Do you have what it takes to b... by pg on Friday March 30, 2007 @06:26PM (#7704)
The difference between this and spam is that the cycle time is too long for people to learn efficiently how to beat the system. A spammer can write an email and send it to his gmail acct and know in 30 sec if it beats the filter. We only accept applicants every 6 months.
Re:Pairwise and Y Combinator: Do you have what it takes to b... by amichail on Friday March 30, 2007 @06:43PM (#7709)
Won't such a test limit the diversity of Y Combinator founders? And so you might get stuck in a local maximum as a result.
Re:Pairwise and Y Combinator: Do you have what it takes to b... by pg on Friday March 30, 2007 @07:38PM (#7724)
We would never use only the test. At most we'd use it to prompt us to take a second look at someone we were about to reject.
Re:Pairwise and Y Combinator: Do you have what it takes to b... by amichail on Friday March 30, 2007 @08:03PM (#7730)
I guess you might try applications like these as well:

online dating

airport security

immigration

finding cofounders