News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Bloodhound – Elasticsearch client and DSL for Haskell.

Re:Bloodhound – Elasticsearch client and DSL for Haskell by MrRoger on Sunday May 04, 2014 @12:49AM (#7693293)
Why you never document your code? You didn't document your Clojure libs and now you're continuing the trend with Haskell. If you're going to make libs, please provide the adequate documentation with examples of usage in the code. I'm not gonna keep going back to the README. I'm going to use Hoogle and Hackage. All those comments in the README could be looking all pretty on Hackage right now.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bloodhound – Elasticsearch client and DSL for Haskell by carterschonwald on Sunday May 04, 2014 @01:16AM (#7693339)
huh, Chris definitely should add some comments to his code. I'll tease him about it for the next week!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bloodhound – Elasticsearch client and DSL for Haskell by coolsunglasses on Sunday May 04, 2014 @01:24AM (#7693356)
Is there a particular Clojure library that you need more documentation for?

I'll transfer the README docs over to Haddock/lhs when I do the next non-trivial release.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bloodhound – Elasticsearch client and DSL for Haskell by swuecho on Sunday May 04, 2014 @01:42PM (#7695043)
that is frustrated me when entering functional language world. rarely good document compared to other language. In Perl, many modules will have their own tutorial
[ Parent | on HN ]