News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Killed Google+ And What Can Save It by dmoy on Saturday May 03, 2014 @01:39PM (#7691629)
Yea, I don't really agree with the trend of big, reputable news places having such an increasing number of random blog posters. There's a big difference between Forbes proper and Forbes random-poorly-researched-blog-article (same goes for other places as well).

Then again you can also raise the same question when the more traditional columnists start spewing random ideas about fields in which they have no expertise...

Re:What Killed Google+ And What Can Save It by differentView on Saturday May 03, 2014 @02:06PM (#7691743)
Whenever I read news articles about things I know well, I wonder how much misinformation I am getting about everything else.
Re:What Killed Google+ And What Can Save It by eternalban on Saturday May 03, 2014 @01:46PM (#7691666)
Possibly a subversively clever way of high lighting the value of "editorial control" ;)
Re:What Killed Google+ And What Can Save It by whoismua on Saturday May 03, 2014 @02:22PM (#7691825)
Forbes does this because it's rewarded by Google, they rank for pretty much everything so they fill it with junk.