News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why I won’t work for Google. Parent comment

Re:Why I won’t work for Google by clips on Saturday May 03, 2014 @03:24AM (#7689953)
How ironic that one would be using Google's cached version to read this
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I won’t work for Google by Aldo_MX on Saturday May 03, 2014 @04:42AM (#7690082)
More ironic that Google has a cached copy and CloudFlare not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I won’t work for Google by Donzo on Saturday May 03, 2014 @06:42AM (#7690280)
Not really ironic because nobody expects that CloudFlare Always On cached copies will actually work.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I won’t work for Google by axanoeychron on Saturday May 03, 2014 @06:59AM (#7690309)
It is not ironic, it's just a coincidence.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I won’t work for Google by porpoisemonkey on Saturday May 03, 2014 @03:38AM (#7689983)
Not at all. Google's caches are pretty commonly used to view pages with high levels of traffic.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I won’t work for Google by etfb on Saturday May 03, 2014 @04:15AM (#7690043)
https://google.com/search?q=define:irony
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I won’t work for Google by porpoisemonkey on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @01:58AM (#7703035)
I'm not sure why you posted this link. The comment I was responding to does not meet any of the definitions you posted.

As others have pointed out using Google cache to view a high traffic anti-Google article would be coincidental and not ironic.

[ Parent | on HN ]