News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Help EFF test Privacy Badger, our new browser extension f... by unhush on Friday May 02, 2014 @01:54PM (#7687103)
Note that Privacy Badger uses a browser history-dependent algorithm for blocking - when you first install it, it doesn't block anything because it assumes that third-party trackers are innocent until proven guilty. When it sees you being tracked on 3+ first-party domains by a third party, it either blocks or cookieblocks the third party. I wrote up a basic description of the algorithm here: https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/blob/master/R...

So if you're testing Privacy Badger on a profile with no browsing history, it is bound to do worse than other extensions. You have to "prime" it with some browsing data before it's really effective.

Re:Help EFF test Privacy Badger, our new browser extension f... by gorhill on Friday May 02, 2014 @03:03PM (#7687487)
I see, so this means results for Privacy Badger reflect a worst-case scenario. I've added links to the proper section in the Privacy Badger's README file.
Re:Help EFF test Privacy Badger, our new browser extension f... by nabla9 on Friday May 02, 2014 @07:24PM (#7688752)
So people who use incognito mode don't benefit much?
Re:Help EFF test Privacy Badger, our new browser extension f... by unhush on Monday May 05, 2014 @03:34PM (#7700641)
Unfortunately not, if you use Incognito by default (other than being able to see who's tracking you and toggle the settings manually). We could add a feature to optionally save data in Privacy Badger between incognito sessions (or use data from the non-incognito sessions to determine which sites to block in incognito sessions).

In Firefox, PBadger Alpha doesn't have permission to operate in Incognito mode yet, so it will just be off.

Re:Help EFF test Privacy Badger, our new browser extension f... by unhush on Monday May 05, 2014 @03:43PM (#7700697)