News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comparing Ember and Angular by williamcotton on Thursday May 01, 2014 @09:53AM (#7679706)
Use React and you get the best of both worlds. React supports server-side rendering.

Apps built with Angular or Ember have major issues with SEO. They'll have to resort to using something like PhantomJS to prerender their HTML. This is not a trivial bit of engineering.

Re:Comparing Ember and Angular by pascalo on Thursday May 01, 2014 @10:06AM (#7679791)
Interesting ... By "supports server side rendering", do you mean react can bind to a chunk of preexisting HTML in the page to enhance it? Or running react on node and build a page? Got an example at hand?
Re:Comparing Ember and Angular by williamcotton on Thursday May 01, 2014 @10:23AM (#7679894)
You'll have to excuse me because I only did a cursory reading of the the following, but it seems to be a decent outline:

http://bensmithett.com/server-rendered-react-components-in-r...

Re:Comparing Ember and Angular by pascalo on Thursday May 01, 2014 @10:46AM (#7680064)
Thanks. Will give that a read.

Edit: Very interesting read liked from there ... https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!msg/reactjs/eUespJPdyas/...

Re:Comparing Ember and Angular by camus2 on Thursday May 01, 2014 @04:45PM (#7682584)
You can render react HTML components in node js without a headless browser, you cant do that with angular,so you can use react on the server.