News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Revocation still doesn't work by danielweber on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @09:20PM (#7677618)
You have to keep the online revocation service up all the time. People will DDoS just for the lulz it causes when it being broken breaks everyone's browser.

While sitting in a meeting I realized there is one situation that online revocation helps: someone steals bank.com's DNS record. They can't necessarily MITM anyone with that.

But, TACK is probably a better countermeasure there.

Re:Revocation still doesn't work by gojomo on Thursday May 01, 2014 @01:05AM (#7678332)
DDoSing DNS would break everyone's browser for lulz too, but somehow the net manages to chug along. And if/when it happens, at least people know they're under attack and direct attention to fixing things.

A service with a clear single point to DDoS is obviously the wrong choice.

What if services all over the net could tell you the latest (<5 minutes old) root/summary-hash of the shared dataset? And, there are many places to either update yourself to that version, or receive a trustworthy proof a certificate is/isn't in that dataset?

If they're all blocked, an alarm should go off, letting the user know it's dangerous to proceed. The failure shouldn't be secret, with the confidence-inspiring lock icon still appearing, for indefinitely long periods.