Had I known about `git symbolic-ref`, I might have used that instead of `git branch`. On the other hand, I would have needed to re-implement lots of what `git branch` does, such as detecting the difference between not being in a git repository and simply not being on a branch.
The interface of `git branch` seems stable enough that I doubt it will break this. If it does, it should take me no longer than 5 minutes to fix, since that's about how long it would take me to re-write the whole thing from scratch.
Is there any particular reason that using `git symbolic-ref` is better than `git branch` in this case, given that I want human-readable output, instead an unambiguous filesystem location?
For the case of not being on a branch, the output of 'git branch' is not very useful. I am currently using 'git name-rev --name-only HEAD', but the contrib script has an even fancier mechanism (via 'git describe') for coming up with something to display when HEAD isn't a symbolic ref.
export PS1='\w:$(__git_ps1 "%s")$ '
EDIT - here's mine btw: function parse_git_dirty {
git diff --quiet HEAD &>/dev/null
[[ $? == 1 ]] && echo "✎ " || echo "➜ "
}
function parse_git_branch {
local branch=$(__git_ps1 "%s")
[[ $branch ]] && echo "$branch$(parse_git_dirty)"
}
PS1='\u@\h $(parse_git_branch)\W $ '
If the branch has local changes it shows the pencil, in addition to the branch name. I'm still experimenting.The OP is an example of wheel reinvented, poorly.
Barring that, logging out and back in will definitely fix it, as long as you didn't put it in one of your bash config files.