Re:Mathematicians trace source of Rogers-Ramanujan identitie...
by GregBuchholz on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @07:20PM
(#7670574)
Can't mention Omega without linking to:
Meta Math!
Re:Mathematicians trace source of Rogers-Ramanujan identitie...
by NAFV_P on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @07:44PM
(#7670669)
Good book, I read it a few years ago.
His own proof that there are infinitely many primes is a good head spinner.
Re:Mathematicians trace source of Rogers-Ramanujan identitie...
by Ind007 on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @04:24AM
(#7672174)
Such a good read.Thanks for sharing this.
Re:Mathematicians trace source of Rogers-Ramanujan identitie...
by JonnieCache on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @04:57AM
(#7672229)
Check him out on youtube too, he's a fun speaker.
Re:Mathematicians trace source of Rogers-Ramanujan identitie...
by jsbgir on Friday May 02, 2014 @04:31PM
(#7687945)
This is really interesting. We could take it further and say that, given that some uncomputable reals have a finite definition (e.g. "the probability that a random algorithm halts"), there is a countable number of definable reals (by assigning a Godel number to each definition), so the uncountability of the reals is strictly due to indefinable numbers!
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computable_number