News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on “Mostly functional” programming does not work. Parent comment

Re:“Mostly functional” programming does not work by GregBuchholz on Sunday April 27, 2014 @02:00PM (#7656045)
We just don't want to forget that exceptions and termination are effects, and that Haskell isn't perfectly pure...

    a,b::Integer
    a = div 1 0
    b = sum [1..]
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Mostly functional” programming does not work by dllthomas on Sunday April 27, 2014 @02:56PM (#7656261)
Certainly the case.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Mostly functional” programming does not work by Dewie on Sunday April 27, 2014 @03:17PM (#7656356)
If you want to avoid partial functions, I guess you would use Safe Haskell.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Mostly functional” programming does not work by dllthomas on Sunday April 27, 2014 @03:35PM (#7656461)
AFAIK, Safe Haskell doesn't do that. Am I missing something?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Mostly functional” programming does not work by Dewie on Monday April 28, 2014 @01:37AM (#7658365)
You're probably right. I can't find any mention of enforcing total functions.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Mostly functional” programming does not work by swift on Sunday April 27, 2014 @05:29PM (#7656986)
Probably you mean the 'safe' package.
[ Parent | on HN ]