"Thee tape in question that was thrown was also bullshit. If anything, it actually made the SFPD look bad"

"I didn’t hit her 117 times, injure her, or cause any trauma as the UCSF medical reports clearly document"

"The girl in question here, was herself so appalled by the false allegations made by the police, that she agreed to be photographed to demonstrate that there were no bruises or injuries."

For someone who is making a lot of evidence-based claims, I notice a remarkable lack of supporting evidence. Surely the video mentioned would contain airtight proof that he didn't "hit, injure, or cause trauma". It would be the goal of an innocent man to get the video into the public eye as soon as possible.

My prediction is that he will not release the video.

Let's see the video then. It's your own private recording system throughout your apartment. I'm sure we can judge from that what the real take is. Maybe it wasn't 117 times but I'm guessing you had a good go at going way over the line. Just because the evidence was thrown out doesn't mean you didn't do it.

My father taught me at a young age to question overly specific statements of denial.

"I didn't hit her 117 times" says nothing. It implies "zero" but its just as easily "116" or "118" or more.

Did this guy seriously use the American Dream as a reason not to hate him?