News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is Stack Overflow so negative of late? by oneeyedpigeon on Saturday April 26, 2014 @09:46AM (#7651353)
Bugs happen. If they get fixed, the process works. It's unrealistic to think that, in an open system, no-one will ever do the wrong thing.
Re:Why is Stack Overflow so negative of late? by ebiester on Saturday April 26, 2014 @10:40AM (#7651504)
If there are enough people complaining that the error recovery system is invoked far too often, the "one-off" bug should instead be given higher priority as a design flaw.
Re:Why is Stack Overflow so negative of late? by Shog9 on Saturday April 26, 2014 @12:39PM (#7651958)
The problem is, it's easy to pull out specific examples that illustrate bad attitudes, mistakes, etc. Stack Overflow gets somewhere between 8 and 9 thousand questions every day - even with only a small % of those being closed, downvoted, dumped on, etc. that's still a lot of opportunity for error - in both directions (plenty of embarrassingly-bad and outright abusive/trolling posts stick around too long too).

So, there are checks and balances and venues for appeal and we try and provide opportunities for both automated systems and humans to review and appeal any decision. If you're patient, it works. If you're not... Well, it's probably not a good place for you to be.

Re:Why is Stack Overflow so negative of late? by collyw on Saturday April 26, 2014 @10:59AM (#7651573)
This wasn't a bugfix, it was a workaround.