Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by mikeash on Friday April 25, 2014 @03:03PM
(#7648443)
Regarding payloads, it depends on what you're launching. If your satellite is 4 tons, then you can directly compare the price of a Falcon 9 and an Atlas, for example. It doesn't get noticeably cheaper to fly a rocket at less than full payload. Obviously, if you're launching something that exceeds Falcon's maximum payload then it's not an option, but given their campaign, there must be a lot of lighter payloads going up as part of this program.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by seacious on Friday April 25, 2014 @09:36PM
(#7650061)
Musk mentioned GPS satellites as one of the kinds of payloads he wanted to bid for. It looks like they fall well within the capacity of the Falcon 9. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_Block_IIF