Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by grinich on Friday April 25, 2014 @02:33PM
(#7648268)
Not many people know that he initially (pre-SpaceX) tried to buy a couple decommissioned ICBMs to send a plant to Mars. He was ready to write the check, and the Russians spiked the price at the last minute.
So he's probably got a grudge or two.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by ash on Friday April 25, 2014 @02:37PM
(#7648291)
I've heard of Russian ICBM story, but I haven't heard of this part before:
> the Russians spiked the price at the last minute
What's the source for this part?
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by grinich on Friday April 25, 2014 @02:52PM
(#7648380)
They had two more trips scheduled to Russia; now Ressi
decided, as he says, "I didn't like dealing with Russians,"
and told Musk he wasn't going back. Musk went anyway. On
the second trip, Musk brought his wife, Justine — "I think
that's the trip when the lead Russian designer started
spitting at us," Cantrell says — and on the third and final
trip he brought his money. He was ready to buy three Russian
ICBMs for $21 million when the Russians told him that no,
they meant $21 million for one. "They taunted him," Cantrell
says. "They said, 'Oh, little boy, you don't have the money?'
I said, 'Well, that's that.' I was sitting behind him on the
flight back to London when he looked at me over the seat and
said, 'I think we can build a rocket ourselves.'"
http://www.esquire.com/features/americans-2012/elon-musk-int...It's a great article.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by rayiner on Monday April 28, 2014 @02:29PM
(#7661938)
I doubt it's a grudge. Accusing your competitor of sending money to the Kremlin in a time when the U.S.-Russia relationship isn't exactly great is simply a well-executed political jab.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl...
by ericcumbee on Friday April 25, 2014 @02:42PM
(#7648330)
What is your source on that? According to a page on the NASA site from Oct 13. The Station is expected be operational through at least 2028.
He's certainly not making friends in Russia today. That said, I feel like the ISS is too important to be left to the whims of the US Congress. IIRC NASA plans to deorbit the American part of it within the next decade, while Russia keeps the rest aloft and turns it into a waystation for planetary missions.