Re:Mark Pincus Steps Down From All Operational Roles at Zynga
by stratagerm on Thursday April 24, 2014 @07:02AM
(#7639358)
> Meanwhile Facebook had changed their policies making Zynga's viral growth more difficult to obtain for their next games
Don't forget that this viral growth was achieved through unethical methods. [1] In the fall of 2009 a number of articles appeared calling out the unethical behavior which changed the climate and forced Facebook to alter its policy:
Scamville: The Social Gaming Ecosystem Of Hell [2]
Scamville: Zynga Says 1/3 Of Revenue Comes From Lead Gen And Other Offers [3]
Zynga CEO Mark Pincus: "I Did Every Horrible Thing In The Book Just To Get Revenues" [4]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zynga#Scam_ads[2] http://techcrunch.com/2009/10/31/scamville-the-social-gaming...
[3] http://techcrunch.com/2009/11/02/scamville-zynga-says-13-of-...
[4] http://techcrunch.com/2009/11/06/zynga-scamville-mark-pinkus...
Re:Mark Pincus Steps Down From All Operational Roles at Zynga
by pfraze on Wednesday April 23, 2014 @07:25PM
(#7637581)
That's a pretty fair view in my mind. Games companies are always troubled by sustainability, so I don't think Zynga's problems are unique - and that's a problem. Their stock would've only been worth buying if they had cracked sustainability, and their early success seemed a bit dressed up to act like they had.
In my opinion Zynga didn't need the cash that the IPO offered to re-invest in their business, it was simply a vehicle to cash out investors.
So, evidence of deception? All I can provide is that as a solid investment opportunity Zynga was anything but, as a well sold story that wall street spun, perhaps so.