Re:AT&T's 'Expansion' of 1 Gbps to 100 Cities is a Big, Fat ...
by xhrpost on Monday April 21, 2014 @02:36PM
(#7622768)
They run fiber to their Uverse nodes and then apparently tell their salespeople to sell this as a feature. I remember one telling me the benefits of a "fiber optic signal" somehow going to my house over copper. I still ended up switching later on since they're cheaper than my local cable provider, though network performance doesn't seem to be as good.
Re:AT&T's 'Expansion' of 1 Gbps to 100 Cities is a Big, Fat ...
by cones688 on Monday April 21, 2014 @03:39PM
(#7623170)
> benefits of a "fiber optic signal" somehow going to my house over copper
This is what is sold in the UK a lot, its called fibre to the cabinet (FTC) and does indeed make a difference, if your cabinet is on the street corner (100m) that beats the 1 mile maybe to the actual exchange as a lot of internet speed is dictated by the decay one gets with copper signals.
[0] http://www.thinkbroadband.com/guide/fibre-broadband.html
Re:AT&T's 'Expansion' of 1 Gbps to 100 Cities is a Big, Fat ...
by JonFish85 on Monday April 21, 2014 @03:34PM
(#7623147)
Maybe they're using Monster cables, for a better digital signal? (Kidding, hopefully obviously)
When I finally squeezed the actual speed of it out of him the answer was 18 Mbps, for $60 a month (of course he could get me a special deal of $40 for the first 3 months, which is the same deal as on their website).
I've used them before (AT&T Uverse) and they require an ATT router/modem, for an additional fee of course, even though using their hardware is technically completely unnecessary.
I actually told him that Time Warner was currently cheaper and more reliable than what he was offering, which is true unfortunately.
AT&T is a joke.