News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rust for C++ programmers – part 2: control flow. Parent comment

Re:Rust for C++ programmers – part 2: control flow by pcwalton on Sunday April 20, 2014 @04:11AM (#7616216)
Yeah, I would rather have "for" defined only to operate on Iterables. If we modified the trait matching rules we could probably do that backwards compatibly post 1.0.
[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.