News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No, don't enable revocation checking by sarahj on Sunday April 20, 2014 @01:50AM (#7616013)
Most of the energy in this space has gone into http://tack.io/ which has been called "a non-controversial first step" - I believe it is making its way though standards talks at the moment although I have not looked into it for a while.

Personally I think now is good time to revisit assumptions made a few years ago - security and privacy and in particular non-government controlled systems are on many peoples lips.

If I ever clear my current plate, I would be interested in diving into the problem.

Re:No, don't enable revocation checking by cpach on Sunday April 20, 2014 @04:44AM (#7616264)
For those interested, here’s the latest update from the TACK mailing list: http://slexy.org/view/s20UsKEoRm (January 2014)