A Haskell Programmer Tries to Learn Racket

Re:A Haskell Programmer Tries to Learn Racket by tel on Wednesday April 16, 2014 @04:53PM (#7600474)

I guess that I don't feel these so painfully because I don't think Node is necessarily successful at it's goal, though I believe its goal is admirable. CPS might not be the most elegant way to schedule threads, but it is fairly simple which is one kind of boon.

I'm also pretty sure that high concurrency means a variety of things allowing a distinction between Node High Concurrency capability and Twitter High Concurrency need. If Node allows newbies to achieve higher concurrency than other newbie tools (PHP, Rails) then I think it can achieve that task to some degree.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Haskell Programmer Tries to Learn Racket by noelwelsh on Thursday April 17, 2014 @01:53AM (#7602172)

I mostly agree with everything you say. I think it's sad that so many in our industry use such poor tools. Racket, for example, is an excellent tool for beginners. The PLT group that produces it has long had a focus on introductory programming and has produced resources such as HtDP (http://htdp.org/) and Bootstrap (http://www.bootstrapworld.org/) yet Racket is far more capable than Node, Ruby, and the like.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Haskell Programmer Tries to Learn Racket by tel on Thursday April 17, 2014 @02:37PM (#7605429)

Complete agreement... A world where Racket was in browsers instead of Javascript would be wonderful.

[ Parent | on HN ]