Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com
by outcoldman on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:05PM
(#7592575)
Ok, I get it, this is a Satire.
But it is not very good made Satire, because it leads to the point that source code in private repositories also can be stolen, which kind of threatens the reputation of GitHub organization. Hope that GitHub will contact this joker and explain how to make good satires.
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com
by quadrangle on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:05PM
(#7592577)
This article is totally confusing. Source is missing? So there's no local fork? Work is disappeared? Or someone just downloaded it and has a copy? How does missing have anything to do with the "someone else in the world is running my code" comment?? Copying would allow others to run the code without it going missing…
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com
by chomp on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:49AM
(#7592441)
Had me until:
"My code could be running on anyone's computer right now, anywhere in the world," said open source developer Andrew Benton. "Frankly, that is terrifying."
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com
by Pinwheeler on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:58AM
(#7592518)
I think the satire value is somewhat diminished by the fact that private repos are possible. If github only hosted open-source projects, then it would be funnier
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com
by dragonwriter on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:13PM
(#7592624)
Its amazing how often on HN people are interested enough to ask questions about an article, but not interested enough to actually click on the link and read it.
EDIT: This is satire? It was poorly done.
[1] https://github.com/explore
"My code could be running on anyone's computer right now, anywhere in the world," said open source developer Andrew Benton. "Frankly, that is terrifying."
Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb ...
So not dumb at all. If something is dumb, it is the article.
Er, with the possible exception of callesgg ...