News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by outcoldman on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:05PM (#7592575)
Ok, I get it, this is a Satire. But it is not very good made Satire, because it leads to the point that source code in private repositories also can be stolen, which kind of threatens the reputation of GitHub organization. Hope that GitHub will contact this joker and explain how to make good satires.
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by quadrangle on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:05PM (#7592577)
This article is totally confusing. Source is missing? So there's no local fork? Work is disappeared? Or someone just downloaded it and has a copy? How does missing have anything to do with the "someone else in the world is running my code" comment?? Copying would allow others to run the code without it going missing…

EDIT: This is satire? It was poorly done.

Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by ColinWright on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:10PM (#7592607)
The words you want are "dumb" and "not that funny". At least, according to the last paragraph in the article.
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by Zikes on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:49AM (#7592436)
This article is mistaken. The fire icon next to the header of Trending Repos on their Explore page [1] clearly shows that those repos are "hot".

[1] https://github.com/explore

Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by ozh on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:55AM (#7592496)
Has someone clicked on "Publish" 2 weeks too late for April's fool?
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by chomp on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:49AM (#7592441)
Had me until:

"My code could be running on anyone's computer right now, anywhere in the world," said open source developer Andrew Benton. "Frankly, that is terrifying."

Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by Pinwheeler on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:58AM (#7592518)
I think the satire value is somewhat diminished by the fact that private repos are possible. If github only hosted open-source projects, then it would be funnier
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by ColinWright on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:34AM (#7592345)
How dumb is GitHub! Not even running on a non-obvious port as the most elementary security measure.

Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb ...

Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by callesgg on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:52AM (#7592457)
That is cause port 22 is ssh used to push git stuff.

So not dumb at all. If something is dumb, it is the article.

Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by RiderOfGiraffes on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:54AM (#7592481)
You do realise this is satire, right?
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by Zikes on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:55AM (#7592497)
You do realize his comment is a continuation of that same satire, right?
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by ColinWright on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:03PM (#7592563)
You do realise that RoG's comment was also a continuation of that satire, right?
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by Zikes on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:06PM (#7592583)
You do realize that I realized that RoG's comment was a continuation of that satire, right?
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by ColinWright on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:08PM (#7592593)
You do realise that we all realise that these comments are a continuation of the satire, yes?

Er, with the possible exception of callesgg ...

Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by Zikes on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:11PM (#7592615)
Or perhaps theirs is the most satirical of all...
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by coldcode on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @11:51AM (#7592452)
Is this a joke or a real problem?
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by dragonwriter on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:13PM (#7592624)
Its amazing how often on HN people are interested enough to ask questions about an article, but not interested enough to actually click on the link and read it.
Re:Source code stolen from GitHub.com by fbomb on Tuesday April 15, 2014 @12:14PM (#7592640)
14 days too late.