Re:Heartbleed disclosure timeline: who knew what and when
by azakai on Monday April 14, 2014 @08:56PM
(#7589762)
Certainly, yes - that would mean that this is not a coincidence.
I'm not arguing this is a coincidence. Just that if it was totally random, it would be very unlikely. So the plausible possibilities are (1) what you suggested, some common cause, or (2) that the discovery happened randomly multiple times but was only disclosed once.
I'm not arguing this is a coincidence. Just that if it was totally random, it would be very unlikely. So the plausible possibilities are (1) what you suggested, some common cause, or (2) that the discovery happened randomly multiple times but was only disclosed once.