News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates? by enneff on Monday April 14, 2014 @02:01AM (#7584753)
By far the most common MITM attack is through untrusted WiFi networks. That's when SSL is most valuable to the user, and also when it's easiest for an attacker to block access to CA servers. Other kinds of MITM attacks are so much less common they're barely worth talking about in this context.

IMO, an adversary that can extract a cert using Heartbleed and set up a MITM should also be advanced enough to block some IP addresses.

I'm confused by the rest of your comments about Gibson. All I said about him was that he continues to generate hysteria without providing details or citing prior discussion. The only things I'm accusing him of are things he is still doing today.

Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates? by shadearg on Monday April 14, 2014 @02:29AM (#7584814)
He has announced that the current state of cert revocation will be covered in detail on the next upcoming episode of Security Now. The current page is wordy and lacking, and I will be very surprised if he doesn't update it with real substantiating information soon.
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates? by enneff on Monday April 14, 2014 @02:41AM (#7584831)
Oh so it's an ad for the podcast? I was wondering about the angle.