Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates?
by mahmud on Sunday April 13, 2014 @08:45PM
(#7583901)
Oh yes, he has been around for long. But he lost a bit of credibility after his wolf-cry when he campaigned against the inclusion of raw-sockets in Windows XP, alleging hackers might use it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates?
by shadearg on Sunday April 13, 2014 @11:04PM
(#7584310)
He's definitely adamant about the ongoing exclusion of raw sockets on Windows and alleges malware would absolutely abuse it if it were available. He still talks about it once and a while and certainly does not regret that stance.
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates?
by wnevets on Sunday April 13, 2014 @10:59PM
(#7584298)
you do realize that he was right and MS removed them right?
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates?
by nuxi7 on Monday April 14, 2014 @12:03AM
(#7584476)
microsoft removed it, but that doesn't mean he was right.
Last I checked, the internet did not end while XP had raw sockets, and windows server retains this capability.
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates?
by wnevets on Monday April 14, 2014 @10:37AM
(#7586384)
So why did MS remove them?
Re:Does your browser rejected revoked certificates?
by mahmud on Monday April 14, 2014 @07:16PM
(#7589455)
Responding to the public hysteria; they couldn't take their chances, they would have been crucified if even a single incident was reported, because they had "forewarning".
Steve Gibson did to raw-sockets what Jenny McCarthy did to vaccines.