Andreessen: Beware Non-Silicon Valley Investors Bearing High Valuations

Re:Andreessen: Beware Non-Silicon Valley Investors Bearing H... by dmk23 on Sunday April 13, 2014 @01:48AM (#7580387)

That's not the point, A16Z is the lead on their key deals.

The lead sets the price/terms and has significant control over who else gets access...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andreessen: Beware Non-Silicon Valley Investors Bearing H... by adambenayoun on Sunday April 13, 2014 @07:24AM (#7580986)

pmarca only highlighted a practice that he thinks is unethical.

Lure a startup into accepting a term sheet at a crazy high valuation and get them into a no-shop clause. Once they break off with other investors, renegotiate the terms on the term sheets to a lower valuation. Since you're in a no-shop clause, you have no leverage over the VC and you have 2 options: Accept the lower valuation because there are no competition or reject the term sheet and start over. I bet lot of companies go with option A.

In the valley this is unacceptable and I am sure if someone would do that thing, companies wouldn't deal with that VC.

a16z sets price on the key deals but they don't renegotiate the terms later on as a tactic. This is the _key_ difference.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andreessen: Beware Non-Silicon Valley Investors Bearing H... by trhway on Sunday April 13, 2014 @02:14AM (#7580437)

some of the SV VC have been taking such lead/guide role wrt. newly coming external money. A16Z seems to have decided to fight the wave instead of riding it.

[ Parent | on HN ]