News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: CTO wants me to leave by danbmil99 on Sunday April 13, 2014 @12:07AM (#7580189)
This right here. The money OP invested -- whether hard cash, or equivalent deferred pay or both -- should have resulted in direct, fully vested stock, just as it does for angels and VC's. (to clarify: it should vest at the rate that the work is performed, not over some arbitrary schedule).

There's this underlying meme in our community that "elbow grease" investment -- working for low pay, no benefits, rejecting other career opportunities -- is somehow worth less than an investor's cash. IMSHO, it's just the opposite -- cash typically doesn't draw down one's pool of emotional well-being and spirit the way hard work does. Work investment should be rewarded with a premium, not treated as somehow less than just money.

Re:Ask HN: CTO wants me to leave by tluyben2 on Sunday April 13, 2014 @06:55AM (#7580937)
What I don't get; shouldn't it already have vested if he is a founder? I'm not sure about the system there but when I found a company those shares are mine?
Re:Ask HN: CTO wants me to leave by saalweachter on Sunday April 13, 2014 @09:05AM (#7581188)
The advice has been given several times, on HN, that founders should vest, so that you don't need to claw back 1/3 the company from a founder who walks away a month in.
Re:Ask HN: CTO wants me to leave by noodle on Sunday April 13, 2014 @11:15AM (#7581545)
This is sane advice if you're playing the standard VC game where you shop around for a co-founder, raise funds, and build a product (not necessarily in that order).

OP's situation sounds more like a bootstrapped small business where he invested his life savings and blood/sweat/tears. I'm not sure that vesting shares is ideal there -- perhaps a well defined shotgun clause or similar is more reasonable to handle unruly founders.