News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple Claims Mogenerator's Methods. Parent comment

Re:Apple Claims Mogenerator's Methods by miweiss on Saturday April 12, 2014 @06:53PM (#7579508)
I've had an app rejected from the selector search the article mentions. As the article says though, I'm sure it's within apple's power to ignore them, especially if lots of existing apps use it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple Claims Mogenerator's Methods by robterrell on Saturday April 12, 2014 @08:32PM (#7579704)
Actually rejected because your app had a MOGenerator selector? Details, please. That adds a lot of information to this story.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple Claims Mogenerator's Methods by kennywinker on Saturday April 12, 2014 @08:41PM (#7579725)
I believe he's saying he's had an app rejected because of a selector conflict, not specifically a selector conflict involving mogenerator.

E.g. he calls `-(void)someMethodWithTheSameNameAsAnApplePrivateMethod` in his code, and App Review rejects it because their tools are telling them he's calling a private method.

[ Parent | on HN ]