Excerpt from ‘Flash Boys’ about Serge Aleynikov and Goldman Sachs

Re:Excerpt from ‘Flash Boys’ about Serge Aleynikov and Goldm... by mullingitover on Saturday April 12, 2014 @02:29PM (#7578673)

> I own the modified code and can report you to the DA if you take it and try to sell it somewhere else.

How does this work with the original copyrighted code? If I take 10k lines of an open source project, tack on an echo or a comment or some nonsense, do I suddenly get to claim ownership of the rest of the code? It would make sense that you could own the delta, but you should only own your delta, not the original code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Excerpt from ‘Flash Boys’ about Serge Aleynikov and Goldm... by HeyLaughingBoy on Saturday April 12, 2014 @06:07PM (#7579386)

The point of GPL is that you own the entirety of the source with your changes. Remove your changes and you're back to the original source which everyone "owns."

"Owns" in quotes because that's not ownership, it's a license to use, modify and distribute the code within certain limitations. I've been dealing with IP lawyers recently over exactly this issue and they're being sticklers over the difference.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Excerpt from ‘Flash Boys’ about Serge Aleynikov and Goldm... by PeterisP on Saturday April 12, 2014 @02:42PM (#7578715)

If a piece of code has parts created/owned by different entities, in order to copy them you need permission from everyone of them. You copy that resulting 10k line program but don't have permission for my delta that's a single comment? You're violating copyright.

[ Parent | on HN ]