Re:Third-Party Twitter Developer Sued By Twitter
by ujjwalg on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @12:19AM
(#757271)
I agree with most of the comments that it seems like a spam tool and using twitter in domain name was not probably a good idea. However, I consider the approach that twitter took to be rather an extreme. They should have made an initial move by emailing the guy and asking him to shut down the service and provided reasons for it and given him a chance to change his practices. I just hate the fact that it is so easy to sue in US which IMO is also one of the reasons that insurance costs are so freakin high.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Third-Party Twitter Developer Sued By Twitter
by tptacek on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @12:50AM
(#757311)
Did you actually read the letter? They haven't filed suit. They aren't trying to recover damages. This guy doesn't need to spend a dollar on legal if he doesn't want to fight Twitter; he just needs to comply with Twitter's demands, or negotiate a better outcome for himself.
Re:Third-Party Twitter Developer Sued By Twitter
by ismarc on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @12:49AM
(#757309)
Have a look at the PDF he links to at the bottom. They sent the standard cease and desist takedown notice. His post shows just how beneficial a real lawyer is in making legal decisions (note, he's not being sued and the letter doesn't say "we'll sue you").
Re:Third-Party Twitter Developer Sued By Twitter
by deancollins on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @10:01AM
(#758081)
can someone explain the difference between
"hand over your business, your domain and your software within 12 days" or we'll see you in court
and
"Being Sued" ?
I know the letter is a cease and desist letter but the we'll take leagal action hardly makes it a 'thanks for adding value to the twitter ecosystem love letter'
Cheers, Dean