Re:Unpythonic Python
by tormeh on Wednesday April 09, 2014 @02:54PM
(#7561480)
That's just horrible. I don't know what more to say about it than that. How did anyone think this would be a good idea on balance?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
When you're writing Haskell in emacs (like you should be), you enable haskell-font-lock-symbols in haskell-mode, and it displays the lambda as it should be (plus a bunch of other symbol corrections for ::, ->, =>, (), ||, &&, etc.)
Full list here: https://github.com/haskell/haskell-mode/blob/master/haskell-...
Re:Unpythonic Python
by gamegoblin on Wednesday April 09, 2014 @03:02PM
(#7561536)
Mmm I suppose it's really just preference. I love that syntax. But I guess there's no arguing about taste.
Well, it's typing-friendly but not (re)learning-friendly. I guess it depends how you weigh those concerns.
Re:Unpythonic Python
by marcosdumay on Wednesday April 09, 2014 @04:59PM
(#7562348)
It's also very reading friendly.
I normally forgive languages being hard to learn if the bring enough utility.