Re:Ask HN: Should links from popular blogs be excluded from ...
by andreyf on Monday August 10, 2009 @07:10PM
(#754291)
In my experience, spamming low-quality posts, not counting the bottom [-8,1] and top [30, inf] gets me an average of about +10 each. The trick is to keep posting comments small (readable at a glance), intriguing (just enough to warrant an upvote), and non-controversial points early on in a popular thread.
If you can't be one of the first commentators, it's best to reply in a way that puts your reply as close to the top as possible - replying to anything "below the fold" is a terrible investment.
[Aside: yes, I'm ashamed to care about karma enough to think these things through, but somehow, I just can't help it]
Re:Ask HN: Should links from popular blogs be excluded from ...
by pg on Monday August 10, 2009 @07:54PM
(#754337)
I think about these things too, but because I'm trying to prevent them from being necessary.
Unfortunately these are hard problems. I've been thinking about them since early Reddit and still don't have solutions.
Re:Ask HN: Should links from popular blogs be excluded from ...
by YuriNiyazov on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @01:26PM
(#755748)
And then you publically complain about being downvoted?
Re:Ask HN: Should links from popular blogs be excluded from ...
by andreyf on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:56PM
(#756833)
Only if I think it'll get me more upvotes ;)
Re:Ask HN: Should links from popular blogs be excluded from ...
by rokhayakebe on Monday August 10, 2009 @07:42PM
(#754323)
Take a look at the top 50 and see their average submission and comment score.
If one throws an hojillion low-quality posts up in a day, a few of those will be ranked +1. That grants frequent posters a ludicrously high karma score for what amounts to little overall contribution to the 'community'.
In a way, it's almost an MMORPG -- the longer you stick around and 'grind', the higher your score gets.