>computer engineering, the most innovative sector of the economy, remains behind
Peculiar why people attribute the former to the natural order of things, while simultaneously attributing the latter to bias.
Personally I think it is important for our society that kids get more exposure to male role-models and caretakers.
>it is unlikely the power dynamics there have gone from biased pro male to biased pro female.
>So yes, the hard won primacy of women in higher education is probably the natural order of things.
Neither of your conclusions follow from your premise.
- People can lie to pollsters because they're not comfortable admitting their true biases.
- People may not have enough maturity or empathy to realize that their own behavior is offensive to others, so they don't think the questions about bias apply to themselves.
Also, the "tech industry" is much bigger than the small world of Silicon Valley startups. In the wider corporate world, where there's more diversity of age and sex (and more HR people keeping a watchful eye on employees), the accepted norms of behavior are very different from "bro culture".
With younger demographics showing far less bias towards gender in polls and elsewhere, and with the tech scene bringing in so much young talent, why is it that non-males are still not accepted as peers by the general male tech crowd? If anything, shouldn't the tech community have accepted non-males long before other industries given these circumstances?