You raise a good counterpoint. Perhaps it's less to do with analogy and more to do with empathy. Which is again a subjective appraisal of the topic.
Re:The Joys And Ethics Of Insect Eating
by gordonguthrie on Saturday April 05, 2014 @04:51PM
(#7538408)
... but your robot isn't delicious...
Not to us, because we don't eat rocks and metal. If there's a planet out there whose apex predator species is silicaceous in the same way we're carbonaceous, then, there, my robot is halfway to being a cricket, and is probably quite tasty when properly prepared.
(I eagerly invite speculation on what, on our notional silicaceous Earth-analog, might constitute a parallel to veganism.)
Re:The Joys And Ethics Of Insect Eating
by gordonguthrie on Saturday April 05, 2014 @06:00PM
(#7538625)
Only eating Apple. Drrump, tissch!
Next time you're in the DC/Baltimore area, look me up! In exchange for a laugh like that, the least I can do is buy you a beer.
Re:The Joys And Ethics Of Insect Eating
by gordonguthrie on Sunday April 06, 2014 @06:33AM
(#7540523)
Hmmm, next time you're in Bonnie Scotland you can buy me one ;-)
If I use a cigarette lighter or a lit match to apply an open flame to one of this robot's thermistors, it will flinch away from the stimulus as fast as it can. This is closely analogous to "what we humans know to be a typical reaction to pain"; if you applied the same stimulus to one of my fingers, after all, I would initially react in much the same fashion.
From this behavioral observation, do you conclude that my robot's subjective experience a) exists at all, and b) encompasses the experience of pain? Does this behavioral observation inform your concept of the morality surrounding how this robot is treated by humans? Why, or why not?