Re:The Disruption of Cable Television Has Arrived
by pbreit on Friday April 04, 2014 @02:18PM
(#7533284)
It's funny that this is what people claim the want (unbundling)! Basically, if unbundling ever really happens, you're going to be paying the same amount of money for 20 channels as you currently do for 200.
A law is not the answer.
Re:The Disruption of Cable Television Has Arrived
by photex on Friday April 04, 2014 @03:01PM
(#7533555)
For me it's about not paying for ads and being able to watch an episode on my schedule.
I'd rather pay the same for the 20 shows I actually watch and see them without commercial interruption after I've put the kids to bed, than pay for 200 I don't care to watch while being sprayed by advertisements hoping that a show doesn't air while the family is eating dinner or tucking the kids into bed.
Re:The Disruption of Cable Television Has Arrived
by bryanlarsen on Friday April 04, 2014 @02:29PM
(#7533355)
You don't have to buy Netflix to get House of Cards. Previous seasons are available on DVD, iTunes, et cetera.
Re:The Disruption of Cable Television Has Arrived
by peckrob on Saturday April 05, 2014 @01:07AM
(#7536038)
Not sure I agree with a legal approach, but I understand the frustration. I have an AppleTV, a Roku, and a PS3 (in addition to a cable box). I'm running out of HDMI ports.
I don't mind subscribing to services, but I'm not buying any more devices until this market matures some.
There should be law to avoid this. I shouldn't have to buy Netflix to buy House of Cards.