Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler by jenscow on Friday April 04, 2014 @04:27AM (#7530016)

Impressive numbers.

VS2012 was shockingly bad. VS2010 users who dodged it were now 2 releases behind.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler by githulhu on Friday April 04, 2014 @06:20AM (#7530361)

Curious, what was so bad about 2012? I could barely even tell the difference when upgrading to 2013, aside from the addition of the nifty Peek Definition feature.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler by chadzawistowski on Friday April 04, 2014 @11:19AM (#7531905)

I wouldn't call 2012 terrible, but 2013 seemed a marked improvement to me. Little features and enhancements were sprinkled all over the place. Better Blend functionality is one enhancement I've noticed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler by 72deluxe on Friday April 04, 2014 @06:04AM (#7530314)

I am still using VS2010 at work. What was bad about VS2012?

VS2010 does keep me from using C++11 features, but that isn't a massive problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler by egeozcan on Friday April 04, 2014 @09:52AM (#7531363)

We are using VS2012 at work and it works like a wonder. Am I missing something?

[ Parent | on HN ]