Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
by tjl on Thursday April 03, 2014 @07:11PM
(#7527728)
Apple has made Darwin open source. That, WebKit, and LLVM are pretty core technologies. A good portion of their technology is open. So, it's not just using free software and not giving back.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Darwin is open source but is there anyone here who has actually used it or got a bootable usable machine from it? I mean, can you even run X on it successfully? I never could (didn't try very hard mind you).
The release of Darwin isn't a massive thing I don't think.
There have been several independent distributions of Darwin. The current one is Pure Darwin.
http://www.puredarwin.org
There have been several independent ones because they all fail. I don't fully understand the dynamics here, but the inability of the community to create a usefully working OS out of all that open code for over a decade speaks volumes.
I wonder if it is because it never gained enough intertia when Macs are good enough with the Mach kernel etc.? I wonder why the varieties of Darwin didn't catch on?
I think a free software operating system binary-compatible with OSX drivers and source-compatible with OSX applications (through GNUStep) would be an exceedingly compelling product. Which is why people keep trying to make it happen. I don't think it helps that you need XCode to compile a lot of the source that Apple releases, which means you need a Mac.
Re:Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
by pessimizer on Thursday April 03, 2014 @07:27PM
(#7527857)
Isn't WebKit a fork of GPLv2 code?
As with everything in technology, it's far more nuanced that that. See podcasts and articles featuring Don Melton for reasons why...