News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:0^0 by pavelrub on Thursday April 03, 2014 @05:02AM (#7521689)
Whatever it is, 2^1=2 is not part of it - it follows from it.
Re:0^0 by thomasahle on Thursday April 03, 2014 @06:40AM (#7521959)
Uhm, anything that is part of a definition follows from that definition.

`A and B implies A' and so on.

In the end a function, in the mathematical sense, is just a long (possibly infinite) table of `from' and `to' values. We could argue that one definition of ^ is more or less complex than another, for some definition of complexity, but I'm not sure which would win, and if it would be useful.

Re:0^0 by pavelrub on Thursday April 03, 2014 @10:26AM (#7523009)
"Follows" in the sense that it is not an axiom - it has a proof of more than one line in the sense of the Hilbert system. Seeing functions as collections of ordered pairs tells us nothing here.

Your definition of ^ doesn't directly tell me that 2^1=2. It does tell me however that 0^0=1.