Re:Microsoft introduces Universal Windows apps
by emeraldd on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @03:53PM
(#7518476)
What about things like Keyboard and Mouse vs. Touch? Network Quality (Persistent highspeed connection vs. intermittent limited quality)? Available storage space (You can consider most desktop machines (1/4 terrabyte or better) unlimited in comparison to mobile devices? Multiple Large displays (not on all I know) vs. single small display? There's alot more there than numeric computation abilities alone to take into consideration.
Re:Microsoft introduces Universal Windows apps
by Zigurd on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @04:58PM
(#7518953)
There are reasons to sit in front of a couple large non-touch displays attached to an uncompromising $5000+ computer. But that's for the <5% that need that and they know who they are.
The other 95% will benefit from being freed from their veal cubicles and looking up at human faces while walking around.
As for mouse vs touch etc. I agree, I think. Microsoft should have made a touch OS that isn't Windows. They might get Windows fully evolved to span that gap about the time Android takes away the enterprise business.
The true boundary between mobile and desktop computing is numeric computation. You don't want to mine bitcoin or your stock market rocket science on a mobile device, mainly due to burning through the battery in a trice.
It never made sense for things called Windows not to have a unified pool of apps. This is a significant improvement.