News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tarsnap price cut by jmathai on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @01:19PM (#7517160)
I'll start with my disclaimer that I'm founder of Trovebox and this isn't a sales pitch because we've focused Trovebox for business use.

Great, that's out of the way. Storing and archiving photos & videos is near and dear to my heart [1] and I believe that cloud storage is one piece of answering yes to the question of "will I have my photos in 50 years?". My entire Shuttleworth Fellowship is based on this.

Here's my $.02.

Cost - we haven't yet but have all the pieces to use Amazon Glacier for storage of high resolution originals. That means storing 100 GB will cost you $1 / month. There's additional costs to keep thumbnails in S3 for immediate access -- my estimate is <$3 all inclusive for that 100GB.

Ownership / Portability - a big part of my fellowship is to see how a hosted service (ala Flickr) can provide 100% ownership and portability. The solution is to let users (optionally) bring their own storage. So you can use the Trovebox software connected to your own Glacier and S3 bucket.

Functionality - I think organization, viewing, sharing and archiving should be merged together. Instead of having your sharable photos in one place and your archives in another --- why aren't they combined?

Raw - we support RAW and do conversion to JPEG.

Open Source - Check [2].

Mobile - Check [3] [4] [5] [6].

API - Check [7].

[1] http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/fellows/current/jaisen...

[2] https://github.com/photo

[3] https://github.com/photo/mobile-ios

[4] https://github.com/photo/mobile-android

[5] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/trovebox/id511845345?mt=8

[6] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.trovebox.a...

[7] https://trovebox.com/documentation

Re:Tarsnap price cut by callmeed on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @05:50PM (#7519324)
I work with wedding & portrait photographers who shoot 100GB or more in a single weekend. So, within a couple years they could be looking at $100/mo+. And it just grows from there.

This is the fundamental problem I've always seen with cloud storage for photo/video pros (or hobbyists): they need long-term storage but the bill just keeps growing. Should they be expected to pay $1k/mo after they've been in business 10 years?

---

On a separate note, how are you doing RAW <-> JPEG conversion on the server?

Re:Tarsnap price cut by jmathai on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @07:26PM (#7519787)
The bill would keep going up, yes. But that's the nature of any growing collection - even if you're using a drobo at home.

The only hope is that cloud storage goes down over those same 10 years at a rate which makes it continually affordable. But it won't always be a fixed cost since the number of photos keeps going up.

The RAW -> JPEG conversion is done using ufraw [1]. We originally tried extracting the thumbnails so the JPEGs would use conversion settings from the camera but most of the thumbnails are too small to do anything useful with.

[1] http://ufraw.sourceforge.net/

Re:Tarsnap price cut by callmeed on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @09:46PM (#7520380)
That also assumes we've reached "peak megapixel" ... it seems to have plateaued recently but I'm not convinced a RAW file in 5 years will be about the same size as now.