News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on April Fools: migrate Apache Subversion project over to the git repo. Parent comment

Re:April Fools: migrate Apache Subversion project over to th... by dasil003 on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @10:47AM (#7515880)
And surprise! I did not argue that. I wish people would read my comment a bit more carefully.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:April Fools: migrate Apache Subversion project over to th... by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @11:40AM (#7516282)
You said:

"If any SVN dev truly believes that svn is better than git in any technical sense then I wouldn't trust the engineering judgment of that developer."

and I gave one example in which svn 'is better than git in a technical sense'.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:April Fools: migrate Apache Subversion project over to th... by dasil003 on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @01:52PM (#7517509)
Poor choice of words on my part, but when I said "in a technical sense", I meant it's data model and architecture. Bindings are just a feature that can be written at any time, data model and architecture are something that can never be fixed.

More importantly, I specifically alluded to use cases that svn is better than git for. In no way did I ever "argue that there is no single use case which wouldn't be affected by this".

[ Parent | on HN ]