News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jwz and Brendan Eich discuss the origins of JavaScript (2... by rockdoe on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @06:55AM (#7514694)
The problem is that it's not healthy for Firefox to be seen as pro or anti gay rights, or whatever not-directly-web-related political issue, really. That's the point of the parent post.

What does the fox say about assault rifle ownership?

Re:Jwz and Brendan Eich discuss the origins of JavaScript (2... by patrickmay on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @07:43AM (#7514841)
<i>The problem is that it's not healthy for Firefox to be seen as pro or anti women's rights, or whatever not-directly-web-related political issue, really.</i>

See the problem now?

Re:Jwz and Brendan Eich discuss the origins of JavaScript (2... by Solarsail on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @09:10AM (#7515206)
I would rather avoid a browser that was either pro or anti women's rights. Or pro or anti abortion. Or pro or anti slavery. Or pro or anti human. Although an anti-human browser might be cool... Tools should not be politically oriented, in general. Mild special case for politics pertaining to the tools themselves, like Firefox supporting an open web.
Re:Jwz and Brendan Eich discuss the origins of JavaScript (2... by rockdoe on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @08:54AM (#7515106)
No. Unless you're implying gay people are less important than women?
Re:Jwz and Brendan Eich discuss the origins of JavaScript (2... by leoc on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @07:52AM (#7514862)
Of course it isn't healthy. My suggestion was that Mozilla might get some lemonade out of the bitter lemons others have already bought for it; and it was made mostly in jest anyway.