0. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/29/nyregion/bloomberg-says-ma...
There is a law which supports it. But that law might well be unconstitutional, in which case the policy it supports is not necessarily legal.
The end of the article argues that racial profiling allows a majority of citizens to ignore problems with policing because abuses are highly concentrated on "other people". This makes police corruption "not my problem".
The problem isn't complacency with the abuses; the problem is that abuses are concentrated on minorities of the population so that the majority of voters/stakeholders don't have enough skin in the game to care.
Must you begin your comment on an article about discrimination by using a stereotype?
Do we? I'm not sure.
Certainly in recent years there has been a notable increase in the number of well publicized incidents of police corruption (and use of excessive force and various rights violations). But is this because such incidents are becoming more common, or because they are more likely to be reported and/or publicized effectively?
I honestly don't know the answer. I'd be interested in hard evidence on either side.
"Do we? I'm not sure."
Actually I find the parent comment such a wide generalization that's it's almost laughable.
Am I the only one getting extremely tired of the anti-american trolls?
I don't know. With advancements in technology, it's easier to catch and share such incidents. That doesn't necessarily mean there is more corruption though.
Seriously, please take this nonsense elsewhere, many of us are well aware of the issues regarding law enforcement in this country.
You should be thankful that corrupt cops are racist because they can't help giving themselves away by mistreating blacks. Until you folks break up the corrupt police brotherhood and take back control of law enforcement, things will only get worse.
Fix the root problem and minority males will cease to have problems like this.