Re:Auroracoin – Forked and Game Over
by cwp on Saturday March 29, 2014 @01:28PM
(#7493006)
And if that's the case, what's the difference between the high-hash-capable defender and a central bank? (Not sarcasm, honest question.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Auroracoin – Forked and Game Over
by icebraining on Saturday March 29, 2014 @01:40PM
(#7493061)
Unlike central banks, a miner with >50% hash-rate can't "print money" as it wishes, that's still regulated by the algorithm.
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/658/what-can-an-a...
The bond market is a pretty strong check on government-backed currencies. It's a stretch to say that a central bank can just print money as it wishes.
Wait, why can't that miner simply unilaterally switch to a better algorithm? Especially if the switchover isn't drastic, the ledger could be effectively destroyed before the minority notices in time to do a clean fork.
Re:Auroracoin – Forked and Game Over
by maxerickson on Saturday March 29, 2014 @08:10PM
(#7494545)
For the fork to mean anything other clients have to also switch algorithms (or they won't even accept any of the fork blocks as valid).
Re:Auroracoin – Forked and Game Over
by lukeschlather on Saturday March 29, 2014 @01:37PM
(#7493047)
The central bank can shut its systems off for a day without worrying about all its assets disappearing when they come back online.