Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by cl8ton on Friday March 28, 2014 @10:40AM
(#7487523)
Sounds plausible I Guess but I wonder how Tesla in this crash description
circumvented Sir Isaac Newton’s laws of motion and the bodily damage the driver should have incurred on negative G's.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by InclinedPlane on Friday March 28, 2014 @10:49AM
(#7487586)
The longer something takes to slow down the less acceleration it experiences.
Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by syncsynchalt on Friday March 28, 2014 @02:59PM
(#7489248)
The Model S is a long car compared to the hatchbacks and mini sedans that we're getting used to. Maybe that has something to do with it.
Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by lotsofmangos on Friday March 28, 2014 @11:06AM
(#7487700)
This sounds as though the car took a while to stop, given the list of things it hit. The G forces won't have been that high.