Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by twistedpair on Friday March 28, 2014 @09:50AM
(#7487191)
Compared to GM that waited recently until 13 people had died before issuing a recall for faulty ignitions? Or how about the 119 deaths from knowingly underinflated tires on Ford Explorers back in 2000? Car companies are reactive and calculating, Tesla is proactive with foresight.
Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by owurkan on Friday March 28, 2014 @09:44AM
(#7487147)
Let's not forget it was a special kind of recall, one where no vehicles were being physically recalled by Tesla.
Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by threeseed on Friday March 28, 2014 @09:44AM
(#7487152)
Did you actually read that article ? Toyota recalled cars and paid damages.
Which is exactly what Tesla would have done.
And you're being disingenuous by comparing a single Tesla incident to the entirety of the automobile industry's history.
Re:Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflect...
by MPetitt on Monday March 31, 2014 @04:45PM
(#7504036)
I did, and I'm not sure what you are trying to say exactly, but the point I was making which others have pointed out as well is that Tesla issued changes not for an issue with their car, but to improve it and make it better. Other car manufacturers waited until there were either deaths, lawsuits, or media outcry to recall cars. They were all reactive purely based on cost-benefit. Tesla decided here that their already incredibly safe cars that have fared better than most, if not all others; could be made even better. What Tesla did is leagues above what any other manufacturer has done in recent memory.
[0]http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142412788732466910...