To be fair, that kind of manager-speak is also used to avoid openly assigning blame for production mistakes, which is generally a good thing.
The problem is when it's "the feature landed" but then "Sam broke the feature".
The problem is when it's "the feature landed" but then "Sam broke the feature".
Sam added a feature. [Sam did or achieved something and has gained some partial responsibility for the end product]
We added a feature. [Sam is lost in the collective, but at least he is part of us]
A feature was added. [name omitted and agency de-emphasized, but the omission is a bit pointed; one still could wonder who added it]
The feature landed. [not even an implied agent here]
This progression removes more and more of the ownership and achievement of the paid worker-bees until they aren't even there. Then, features are simply landing left and right out of the sky, according to the Jobs-like "vision" of designers, PMs, executives.
Edit: it's like "damnatio memoriae" for the people who are actually laying the brick.