News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paramilitary police: Cops or soldiers? by hga on Sunday March 23, 2014 @10:21AM (#7453396)
Well, the same Congress that passed the Bill of Rights also passed the first militia act, basically all able bodied men up to age 45 as I recall. As it stands today, per 10 U.S. Code ยง 311:

"The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311)

Following that, the unorganized militia are the above minus those in the National Guard or the Naval Militia. Per modern interpretation of Federal law, this now probably includes women.

Re:Paramilitary police: Cops or soldiers? by maxcan on Sunday March 23, 2014 @11:41AM (#7453703)
Women aren't compelled to register for the selective service, so, perhaps not.
Re:Paramilitary police: Cops or soldiers? by hga on Sunday March 23, 2014 @01:18PM (#7454107)
Indeed, and as I recall there's some Federal case law pertaining to that, which is why I said "perhaps".

But the flip side is that attitudes today would not say that a woman "taking up arms" like men do is illegitimate. See, e.g., the one law that failed in the recent Colorado gun grabbing batch, that would have banned concealed carry at public colleges (note the minimum age for a licence is 21).

Women did not like being told they weren't fit to carry to defend themselves against rape and made a compelling case. Evie Hudak, the woman legislator who took point on the opposite side, had to resign so that she wouldn't be recalled like two previous state senators, replaced with a Republican, and flip control of the state senate.