Open source bike comparison and review

Re:Open source bike comparison and review by abengoam on Friday March 21, 2014 @07:24PM (#7445643)

I parsed it as (open source bike) comparison and review, not as (open source)(bike comparison and review).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Open source bike comparison and review by PhineasRex on Friday March 21, 2014 @08:17PM (#7445999)

I did this as well and was rather disappointed with the reality.

I wonder if there are enough open source bikes for a worthwhile comparison.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Open source bike comparison and review by bike_index on Friday March 21, 2014 @08:26PM (#7446078)

Clearly we need to make some. There was that cardboard bike guy?... But I think that flopped. The future is yours!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Open source bike comparison and review by moron4hire on Friday March 21, 2014 @08:35PM (#7446134)

What materials could we use to prototype? Cheap materials and rapid construction should probably take precedent, to ensure speedy iterations by a large number of people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Open source bike comparison and review by bike_index on Friday March 21, 2014 @08:43PM (#7446197)

Love and Richard Stallman's facial hair, just like all the best open source projects.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Open source bike comparison and review by jakejake on Saturday March 22, 2014 @04:18AM (#7448276)

Same here, I thought it was going to be "open source" as in part lists that people had used to build their own bikes.

The site still looks useful and probably will be even more so when there's more bikes to choose from.

[ Parent | on HN ]